Sunday, March 25, 2012

Art and Identity: The Museum of Modern Art


               Identity, whether it be personal, cultural or historical is solely based upon how one views it. Although society categorizes it with one definition, it is easy to describe it in various ways. I was able to visit the Museum of Modern art where in two exhibits one being “Cindy Sherman”, the other “Contemporary Galleries: 1980- Now” I found pieces of art that by my definitions described a sense of personal, cultural, and historical identity.
                In the Contemporary Gallery one of the artworks displayed was “Tormented Self Portrait” by Ashley Bickerton. As I viewed this, I automatically thought of products. It was a collage of different logos representing consumer products. Altogether it was a representation of different brand names which came across as a type of cultural identity. Within different cultures different products are used. In the American culture, for the most part, brand names are particularly important. Viewing this specific artwork made me think about how different people really are. The brand names displayed were foreign to me, but as a couple passed behind me they knew almost every single one of them. I believe the artist; Ashley Bickerton was focusing on representing a particular group making this work fit into a category of cultural identity.
                Another piece of artwork that stood out to me in the Contemporary Gallery was that of Doris Salcedo with “Atrabiliarios.” As I came across it, it was simply old mistreated shoes in the wall. A bit confused I read a reading posted on the wall. These shoes were a representation of people who disappeared during the Colombian Civil War that began in the 1960’s, making it fit into historical identity, or lack there of. This artwork was a unique way of showing respect to those who are no longer with us.
                Last but not least and artwork that came across as personal identity was one in Cindy Shermans display. “Doll Clothes” is a film that was transferred to DVD. In the film there is a doll that is going through pages of clothing for her, seems as though she is looking for something in her taste. She finds a dress, puts it on, just to be later grabbed by a hand, have the dress taken off of her and placed back inside the page. This represented personal identity because the doll was looking for something she liked, but then forced to change. I translated that to a sense of imprisonment where she can’t express herself the way she wanted.
                Identity is the state or fact of being the same as one described. So although we have general ideas as to what cultural, historical and personal identity is, it can be described or shown as different things. The examples I’ve discussed from the Cindy Sherman and Contemporary Galleries: 1980-Now exhibits, are only pieces that came across as identity to me. For the most part, just like art, expression of identity depends on who views it.



Ashley Bickerton
“Tormented Self Portrait”
Synthetic Paint, bronze powder and lacquer on wood, aluminum, rubber, plastic, leather, chrome-plated steel and canvas.
1987-88

Doris Salcedo
“Atrabiliarios”
Wall installation with plywood, shoes, animal fiber, thread, and sheepskin, six niches
1992-93

Cindy Sherman
“Doll Clothes”
16mm film transferred to DVD 
1975

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Narrative Digital Collage



I'm very into fashion. I love the creativity, the originality and they beauty of fashion. As I was looking for images to create my collage i ran into a picture of a model falling on the runway. Originally I was going to choose an airplane runway as my background but I wanted to give more meaning to the photo. So I chose a model runway. From there it all just came together. I wanted to add a little humor to my collage so I found a lot of pictures of models falling while walking down the runway, and it all fell in place. I then added the paparazzi and the crowd laughing to finish it off. <br><br>

Thursday, March 8, 2012

Good Art, Bad Art.

Good Art

Even though I can't honestly say that I am big on Art, I do appreciate beauty. I believe for art to be good, it has to be beautiful. It may sound shallow or what not, but to catch my attention you need to capture my eye. And beauty does just that. After beauty I also need to get a story from the artwork. It has to tell me something, it has to send a message whether it be understandable or not. And maybe I am just saying this because I only pay attention to artwork that first gets my attention, then tells a story. If I paid closer attention I might consider good artwork to contain different qualities than those I mentioned.


Bad Art

I know thousands may disagree with what I consider to be bad art, but this is an opinion based question :). Bad art is something I can not relate to and just does not interest me. When I think of bad art I think of old. Some people find antiques beautiful, and while sometimes I do the same, I prefer modern or contemporary art. Artwork up to date with the present timeframe. Also, I think bad art is something you can not relate to anything. As much as I enjoy abstract art or non-objective, I don't think it should really be considered art. Stating what bad art is, is a lot more difficult solely because i dont think bad art can really be defined. Nobody is the same, everyone has different taste.